Skip to main content
Case Studies

Documented Project Outcomes

SkyPlotter is in Phase 1 of its operational build-out. Case studies will be published here as paying engagements complete and clients approve publication. This page is written transparently, not as marketing fluff.

— Honest Status

Why This Page Looks Empty

A short, direct explanation of where the company is right now and what that means for the case study record.

SkyPlotter LLC was founded on 15 July 2025 as a Florida limited liability company. The company is owner-managed and serves commercial clients across the United States and the European Union, with current EU coverage focused on Germany.

We are in Phase 1 — building the operational and regulatory foundation. That work includes vetting subcontractor pilots in both jurisdictions (FAA Part 107 in the United States, EASA Open Category A1, A2, and A3 under EU Regulation 2019/947 in the European Union), formalizing standard operating procedures, and putting written flight specifications and quality control checklists in place before the first paying engagement is documented publicly.

Case studies will be published here once paying engagements have completed and clients have approved publication. Until that happens, this page documents what a SkyPlotter case study will look like — not what we have already done. We would rather show you a structure we will hold ourselves to than backfill a portfolio with claims we cannot stand behind.

— The Structure

What a SkyPlotter Case Study Will Include

Every published case study will follow the same four-part structure. No fabricated numbers. No fictional clients.

01

Challenge

The site context, the engineering question the client needed answered, and the regulatory or access constraints that shaped how the work could be executed. Written from the client's perspective — what they were trying to decide, plan, or document.

02

Approach

Sensor selection, flight planning, and the RTK / PPK plus ground control point methodology applied to that capture — documented at the level a reviewing engineer would expect. Why we chose what we chose, and what that means for the data the client received.

03

Deliverables

The orthomosaic, digital terrain model, classified LAS point cloud, contour set, or thermal anomaly report formats produced for the engagement — and the downstream design, planning, or maintenance workflow each one was built to feed into.

04

Engineering Outcome

What the deliverables enabled the client team to do — design, decide, plan, document, or schedule maintenance — against the project-specific accuracy targets agreed in the Statement of Work. Outcomes are written in the client's own terms, not in marketing language.

— Our Commitment

How We Will Document Outcomes

A short promise about what you can expect every published case study to be.

Every published case study will be reviewed by the named client before it appears on this page. Site identifiers, project names, and personnel will be anonymized where the client requests it. Any accuracy figures stated will reference the Statement of Work agreed with that specific client and the ground control point validation conducted on that capture — not generic vendor specifications and not reused numbers from another engagement.

SkyPlotter LLC is not a licensed land surveyor. Deliverables are not legal boundary determinations or certified surveys.

Be Our First Documented Case Study

If your project would benefit from documented aerial data and you are open to having that engagement published as a case study (subject to your approval), we would like to hear from you.

Typical response · same business day